This may or may not be related, but does it feel like churches (and sometimes libraries, and *maybe* some university buildings) are the last places with interesting architecture? All of the new houses near me seem to take the same general style. All of the office buildings, stores, strip malls, etc mimic one another. The only places that try to be unique are religious buildings or places of learning.
It's a really complex problem! Public buildings meant for leisure or spiritual activities, like concert halls, libraries, amusement parks, and places of worship, do get interesting architecture (although how beautiful contemporary architecture is is a a highly controversial question!). More utilitarian buildings, like office buildings, get more basic architecture. Unless the company is really rich and tries to do something special, like tech corporations sometimes do. Residences follow all sorts of trends but since we build so little housing they tend to try to minimize cost and end up looking drab. All of this is, I think, a specific instance of the broader question of aesthetics the same way that my post is.
I came here from Experimental History's blog, even though it's an older post, I just wanted to say I enjoyed this.
This does seem like an extremely rosy view on liberalism however:
"the Statue of Liberty overlooking New York harbor. Lady Justice, blinded and watchful. Neoclassical buildings, serving as the houses of government or the law, with their white marble columns and stately appearance — a nod to the birthplace of democracy in ancient Athens. Sounds: the chatter of lively debate in a coffee house of the Enlightenment; the bustle of an industrious and ethnically diverse city; the scribbling a quill laying down the principles of political liberty."
For other people it might bring to mind corporate news readers, clownish demagogues, for-profit universities, cities where everyone works pointless office jobs and rents cramped apartments, maybe stuff related to the British and American empires, colonies, sweatshops, the atom bomb etc.
Oh, certainly, and likewise for Christianity or any other ideology, really. To focus on aesthetics is to deliberately create a rosy view of the thing. Detractors might of course want to do the exact opposite.
Vaporwave aesthetics are honestly not a bad idea for a future (although probably not for EA) aesthetic that might work for liberalism. Mix the classical architecture with palm trees along with some shapes in pink, blue, and yellow. This would be a great way to reinvigorate liberalism by associating it with retro-futurism instead of early 19th-century government pre-Darwin optimism. Make a Vektroid track the national anthem and liberalism would reign the rest of the 21st century.
Love this article, on so many levels! Western art needs to return to its classical heritage. This postmodernist and deconstructionist nonsense has turned all of our art into ugliness! Also, very insightful observation about the role of aesthetics in promoting social, political, or even religious ideologies.
I love this, and solarpunk immediately popped into my mind before you mentioned it. Unfortunately I think its art-nouveau stylings and some of its political ties (eg. implied degrowth) are maybe a little off-brand and , so classicism is a great fit.
Just dropping in to say I really liked this essay and have continued to think about it since I read it two weeks ago. More, please!
Thanks Adam! I've been enjoying your own Substack as well.
This may or may not be related, but does it feel like churches (and sometimes libraries, and *maybe* some university buildings) are the last places with interesting architecture? All of the new houses near me seem to take the same general style. All of the office buildings, stores, strip malls, etc mimic one another. The only places that try to be unique are religious buildings or places of learning.
It's a really complex problem! Public buildings meant for leisure or spiritual activities, like concert halls, libraries, amusement parks, and places of worship, do get interesting architecture (although how beautiful contemporary architecture is is a a highly controversial question!). More utilitarian buildings, like office buildings, get more basic architecture. Unless the company is really rich and tries to do something special, like tech corporations sometimes do. Residences follow all sorts of trends but since we build so little housing they tend to try to minimize cost and end up looking drab. All of this is, I think, a specific instance of the broader question of aesthetics the same way that my post is.
I came here from Experimental History's blog, even though it's an older post, I just wanted to say I enjoyed this.
This does seem like an extremely rosy view on liberalism however:
"the Statue of Liberty overlooking New York harbor. Lady Justice, blinded and watchful. Neoclassical buildings, serving as the houses of government or the law, with their white marble columns and stately appearance — a nod to the birthplace of democracy in ancient Athens. Sounds: the chatter of lively debate in a coffee house of the Enlightenment; the bustle of an industrious and ethnically diverse city; the scribbling a quill laying down the principles of political liberty."
For other people it might bring to mind corporate news readers, clownish demagogues, for-profit universities, cities where everyone works pointless office jobs and rents cramped apartments, maybe stuff related to the British and American empires, colonies, sweatshops, the atom bomb etc.
Oh, certainly, and likewise for Christianity or any other ideology, really. To focus on aesthetics is to deliberately create a rosy view of the thing. Detractors might of course want to do the exact opposite.
Vaporwave aesthetics are honestly not a bad idea for a future (although probably not for EA) aesthetic that might work for liberalism. Mix the classical architecture with palm trees along with some shapes in pink, blue, and yellow. This would be a great way to reinvigorate liberalism by associating it with retro-futurism instead of early 19th-century government pre-Darwin optimism. Make a Vektroid track the national anthem and liberalism would reign the rest of the 21st century.
Love this article, on so many levels! Western art needs to return to its classical heritage. This postmodernist and deconstructionist nonsense has turned all of our art into ugliness! Also, very insightful observation about the role of aesthetics in promoting social, political, or even religious ideologies.
New Atheism is too boring. Pastafarism is where it's at.
Also Dogecoin is the proof that sometimes all you need is good aesthetics.
I love this, and solarpunk immediately popped into my mind before you mentioned it. Unfortunately I think its art-nouveau stylings and some of its political ties (eg. implied degrowth) are maybe a little off-brand and , so classicism is a great fit.
I just can't sign on to any movement that includes Peter Singer. He is repugnant to me.
His views on art if nothing else have definitely made him much less sympathetic to me.